Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability

IT, Resource Productivity, Environmental Preservation, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

GHG Regulation & Data Management: Australia

1 Comment

The following table outlines the phased nature of compliance with Australia’s 2007 NGER Act (courtesy Deloitte consulting). Looking at the table, the thinking seems to be that the more you emit, the sooner you must report.

Regarding software systems for supporting carbon tracking, reporting, etc., Deloitte concludes that as of December 2009, organizations face four key challenges:

  • Immature systems and processes (manual spreadsheets, uneven auditing, etc.)
  • Complexity of measuring emissions (what must be measured and how to be consistent over time)
  • Uncertain reporting boundaries (who’s responsible for what, e.g., in complex supply chains)
  • Data quality.

While much is made of accounting for carbon and changing processes to reduce emissions, less is made of the financial dimensions: cost/benefit of reporting, cost/benefit of emission reduction, time schedule, NPV, etc. Both are critical elements of well-designed carbon reporting services.

Advertisements

Author: nigelpm

Associate Professor of Information Systems, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan - Helping organizations to navigate digital transformation.

One thought on “GHG Regulation & Data Management: Australia

  1. Pingback: GHG Regulation & Data Management: 2 U.S. Reporting Rules « Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s